déposer
version française rss feed
HAL : hal-00399881, version 1

Fiche détaillée  Récupérer au format
International Journal of Digital Library Systems 1, 1 (2010) 44-61
Beyond institutional repositories
Laurent Romary ( ) 1, 2, Chris Armbruster 3
(01/2010)

The current system of so-called institutional repositories, even if it has been a sensible response at an earlier stage, may not answer the needs of the scholarly community, scientific communication and accompanied stakeholders in a sustainable way. However, having a robust repository infrastructure is essential to academic work. Yet, current institutional solutions, even when networked in a country or across Europe, have largely failed to deliver. Consequently, a new path for a more robust infrastructure and larger repositories is explored to create superior services that support the academy. A future organisation of publication repositories is advocated that is based upon macroscopic academic settings providing a critical mass of interest as well as organisational coherence. Such a macro-unit may be geographical (a coherent national scheme), institutional (a large research organisation or a consortium thereof) or thematic (a specific research field organising itself in the domain of publication repositories). The argument proceeds as follows: firstly, while institutional open access mandates have brought some content into open access, the important mandates are those of the funders and these are best supported by a single infrastructure and large repositories, which incidentally enhances the value of the collection (while a transfer to institutional repositories would diminish the value). Secondly, we compare and contrast a system based on central research publication repositories with the notion of a network of institutional repositories to illustrate that across central dimensions of any repository solution the institutional model is more cumbersome and less likely to achieve a high level of service. Next, three key functions of publication repositories are reconsidered, namely a) the fast and wide dissemination of results; b) the preservation of the record; and c) digital curation for dissemination and preservation. Fourth, repositories and their ecologies are explored with the overriding aim of enhancing content and enhancing usage. Fifth, a target scheme is sketched, including some examples. In closing, a look at the evolutionary road ahead is offered.
1 :  GEMO (INRIA Saclay - Ile de France)
INRIA – CNRS : UMR8623 – Université Paris Sud - Paris XI
2 :  Institut für Deutsche Sprache und Linguistik (IDSL)
Humboldt Universität Berlin
3 :  Max Planck Digital Library (MPDL)
Max-Planck Gesellschaft
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Sciences de l'information et de la communication
Scientific information – publication repositories – institutional repositories – digital libraries – research infrastructure – deposit mandate – interoperability – open access
Liste des fichiers attachés à ce document : 
PDF
IJDLS_V1.5.pdf(208.9 KB)
CALR-jp.pdf(412.9 KB)

tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...
tous les articles de la base du CCSd...