Evaluation of bias-correction methods for ensemble streamflow volume forecasts

T. Hashino (1) , A. A. Bradley (2) , S. S. Schwartz (3)

1 Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences [Madison]
2 University of Iowa [Iowa City]
3 CUERE - Center for Urban Environmental Research and Education

Ensemble prediction systems are used operationally to make probabilistic streamflow forecasts for seasonal time scales. However, hydrological models used for ensemble streamflow prediction often have simulation biases that degrade forecast quality and limit the operational usefulness of the forecasts. This study evaluates three bias-correction methods for ensemble streamflow volume forecasts. All three adjust the ensemble traces using a transformation derived with simulated and observed flows from a historical simulation. The quality of probabilistic forecasts issued when using the three bias-correction methods is evaluated using a distributions-oriented verification approach. Comparisons are made of retrospective forecasts of monthly flow volumes for the Des Moines River, issued sequentially for each month over a 48-year record. The results show that all three bias-correction methods significantly improve forecast quality by eliminating unconditional biases and enhancing the potential skill. Still, subtle differences in the attributes of the bias-corrected forecasts have important implications for their use in operational decision-making. Diagnostic verification distinguishes these attributes in a context meaningful for decision-making, providing criteria to choose among bias-correction methods with comparable skill.

Domaines: Interfaces continentales, environnement; Océan, Atmosphère; Sciences de la Terre

T. Hashino, A. A. Bradley, S. S. Schwartz. Evaluation of bias-correction methods for ensemble streamflow volume forecasts. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2006, 3 (2), pp.561-594. ⟨hal-00298675⟩